The Amboy Times

CAIR Blames the Jew

An Anti-CAIR Blogburst.

IDF Attacked Boarding Flotilla Ship

 

The modern State of Israel recently attempted to peacefully dissuade a flotilla of ships from landing “humanitarian” supplies at the blockaded Gaza Strip. The flotilla was invited several times by the Israeli government to offload the supplies in Israel proper where the supplies would be delivered once they had been inspected for contraband. The flotilla was determined to run the blockade and was boarded by elements of the IDF.

There is indisputable video evidence of how murderous the Jihadist occupants of the Turkish ship Mavi Marmara planned to become as they attacked an IDF boarding party. As they were boarding the ship, the leading element of IDF Commandos who were carrying non-lethal paintball guns were immediately and viscously attacked and beaten by men wielding clubs, steel rods, knives, wrist-rocket slingshots and other instruments meant to maim and kill. The IDF soldiers were given permission to use their sidearms only after one of them was thrown 30 feet from the upper to lower deck.

The Hamas Brothers of CAIR ignore these glaring facts.

As expected in a case such as this, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) went into immediate “Blame the Jew” mode of operation.

From the hate-spewing mouth of CAIR’s Terrorist-Supporting National Executive Director, Nihad Awad: "It is imperative that President Obama not only speak out strongly against this massacre of civilians but also demonstrate our nation's outrage at Israel's brutal actions by taking concrete steps to end the humanitarian siege imposed on Gaza with America's support."

CAIR notes that there were former ambassadors and even a “Nobel Peace Prize” winner sailing with the flotilla “peace activists”.  How interesting that these supposedly educated people would make common cause with Islamist’s who would reward those who help them by "murdering them last."  As for the Nobel Peace Prize winner, there isn’t a rational person alive on the planet with any respect for a “prize” awarded to the odious Yassir Arafat or other Jew-hating political figures.

Bloated CAIR Stooge Ibrahim Hooper weighed in with a predictably misleading statement concerning maritime law:  "Israel had no right under international law whatsoever to land military forces on civilian ships in international waters."

Stanford Law professor Allen Weiner, former State Department lawyer and legal counselor at the American Embassy in the Hague makes the international law issue clear:  "The Israeli blockade itself against Gaza itself is not illegal, and it's okay for Israeli ships to operate in international waters to enforce it."

The governments of Germany, France, and Turkey have joined in the chorus of condemnation and scorn on Israel.

Has the world truly gone mad?

The Israeli Navy intercepted the flotilla in a attempt to prevent the landing of uninspected goods destined for Gaza and into the hands of Hamas- an organization that eats, lives, and breathes the killing of Jews- and it is the Jews fault for refusing to lie down and have his head cut off?

Europe, no great friend of Jews; where violent skinheads routinely parade in NAZI-type gear with red and black flags reminiscent of the Third Reich, where the Holocaust was planned and carried out not only by Germans but with the eager help of Vichy France and other assorted anti-Semites in other lands, dares to lecture Israel about International Law?  Where was International Law during the Holocaust? Where is the law today? Where is the law when French Police refuse to enforce the law in "no-go" Islamist enclaves throughout France? Where is Great Britain when Islamists routinely hold protests displaying murderous threats and slogans supporting the death of non-muslims, Christians, and Jews and are protected by the Metropolitan Police?

And yet Europe would presume to lecture the Jews of Israel.

The Jews learned a hard, bitter lesson from the Holocaust. If they do not stand up for themselves, nobody will.

The United States will be torn apart if even half the subversive goals of CAIR are met. We already see radicalized Muslim extremists in the highest levels of our government and serving in our military and the police forces of our communities. The Jews of Israel see this and they do the one thing we won’t: they draw the necessary lessons and then prevent it from happening to them.

If we are serious about preserving life, we must aid and support Israel.

Israel is not, like many countries, asking us for troops. They only want the means and the good wishes of the United States to do exactly what the United States would do: defend their homeland from attack.

Story Links:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6jDIQr59Sk
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127140754
http://www.youtube.com/user/idfnadesk#p/a/u/1/gYjkLUcbJWo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3L7OV414Kk&feature=player_embedded
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3896796,00.html
http://www.anti-cair-net.org/FBItiesCAIRHamas
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/south-florida-jews-bemoan-harm-to-peace-efforts-721183.html
http://www.wtop.com/?nid=105&sid=1970055
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:1dzQebb_aUIJ:www.facebook.com/notes/cair/cair-president-obama-must-condemn-gaza-flotilla-massacre/399008929441+flotilla+council+on+american-islamic+relations&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/01/AR2010060102934.html?hpid=topnews
http://www.anti-cair-net.org/ProvenCAIRtruth
http://www.anti-cair-net.org/CAIRMuslimMafia.html
http://www.anti-cair-net.org/CAIRMuslimsTruth.html
http://www.anti-cair-net.org/CAIRDefendingMuslimBrotherhoodHamasHolyLandFoundation.html
 

CAIR-Chicago; “Labels Are Inflammatory And Wrong”

Another Anti-CAIR Blogburst.

Christina Abraham, civil right director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-Chicago) wrote a recent column for the Naperville Sun complaining that labels are wrong; particularly as they apply to CAIR.

     Abraham briefly mentions the Irshad Learning Center's desire to have their property used as a religious institution. When the DuPage County Board refused a permit, CAIR-Chicago filed suit charging the county board with violating the learning center’s federal rights. Abraham insists that this is an example of the local community labeling all Muslims as a potential threat.

     Abraham’s column spins off from a run-of-the-mill permit fight, to Abraham ranting that “labeling” is wrong. She cites as evidence the listing of CAIR as an “unindicted co-conspirator” in the Holy Land Foundation trial. She bleats that "neither the ILC nor CAIR-Chicago have ever been labeled unindicted co-conspirators of anything."

     Anti-CAIR compiled a detailed report on what the Holy Land Foundation case revealed about CAIR's ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, and in particular, FBI wiretapped statements that CAIR founder Omar Ahmad could "register 100 organizations in 100 cities in one day", and that they didn't have enough people to do the work they wanted to "hide".

     Perhaps Christina Abraham could explain what kind of work Omar Ahmad's "organizations" would need to hide?

     And as is par for CAIR, Abraham conveniently forgets that her own organization is a leading player in the “labeling game”. To take just two well-known examples we have only to look at the scorn CAIR continually heaps on two of America’s leading experts on radical Islam, Dr. Daniel Pipes and Mr. Steven Emerson.  According to CAIR, both men are guilty of “Islamophobia” for daring to expose the actions of radical Islamists.

     Abraham says in her column that labeling without reason isn’t right and of course, she is correct.

     However, what have Pipes and Emerson done to cause CAIR to label them?  CAIR has never been able to refute the truths that either man has presented and exposed about radical islam or CAIR, yet CAIR attempts to label them as “Islamophobic”.

     Why?  Simply because CAIR's entire fundraising money-train is based on being the organization that determines what constitutes “Islamophobia” and just who deserves the label.

     Anti-CAIR has a few labels for CAIR.

     We label CAIR and every single CAIR chapter as working for the destruction of our country from within.

     We label CAIR a terrorist supporting front organization created for Hamas, that was not only founded by terrorists, but accepts, to this day, financial assistance from foreign governments and individuals who support Islamist terror.

     We accuse CAIR of being Hamas’s American branch.

     We accuse CAIR’s leadership, at all levels including Christina Abraham, as either being complicit in CAIR’s plans to destroy our Constitutional Republic or of being useful idiots in CAIR’s plot to destroy freedom.

     The “Irshad Learning Center” should be wary of accepting any help from CAIR.  CAIR’s legal reputation involves hiring non-attorney’s to represent Muslim immigration case clients and then attempting to cover up its depredations by paying “hush money” to victims.

     There is a reason CAIR has so many ugly labels: CAIR earned every one of them.

CAIR: Legitamacy Questioned

Another Anti-CAIR blogburst.

Several Oklahoma state lawmakers recently faced questions over their announced attendance at the Council on American-Islamic Relations Oklahoma chapter's annual banquet (CAIR-OK). CAIR sent an email touting the attendance of Lt. Gov. Jari Askins, Attorney General Drew Edmondson, Department of Corrections Director Justin Jones, two state senators and seven state representatives.  The email featured photos of several people including State Rep. Richard Morrissette and Attorney General Drew Edmondson.   

Morrissette and Edmondson later said they would not attend the CAIR event after learning of CAIR's disreputable background.  While this was good news for those who support the marginalizing of Islamist hate groups generally, and CAIR in particular, there are questions that Oklahoma’s politicians should be called upon to answer.

• Did any state officials bother to do even a cursory check on CAIR’s background before accepting invitations from CAIR?  Considering the threat of terror present in the country today, it would appear that people on some official’s staff have dropped the ball.

• If a background check was done on CAIR before accepting an invitation, who did the check and what was the result(s)?  Was Oklahoma law enforcement consulted?  If so, what was its opinion(s)?

• State Rep. Richard Morrissette says he was not intending to attend CAIR’s event and that after learning more about the issue he informed CAIR he was disassociating himself from the group.  The question he should answer is if he was not intending to attend, why did CAIR feel free to use his photo and imply he would attend?  In addition, Morrissette should explain what was his opinion of CAIR before his attendance became public?  What specific information about CAIR made him change his mind?

• Attorney General Drew Edmondson, candidate for Governor, also opted out from attending. Why did CAIR feel empowered to use his photograph?  How does AG Edmondson feel knowing that a Muslim Brotherhood front group created to support Hamas was using him as a shill to feign legitimacy? Why isn’t the AG, the top lawman in Oklahoma, better informed about CAIR?  Shouldn’t Oklahoma's AG be better informed of the threat of radical Islam and Islamist supporting terrorist groups?  The AG has a lot of explaining to do if he wants to be Governor.

Kevin Calvey, a former state representative and candidate for U.S. Congress says it is inappropriate for elected officials to attend any CAIR event.  He notes court action and FBI evidence exposing CAIR's ties to Hamas.  Calvey has personally attended protests denouncing CAIR and turned down meeting with Razi Hashmi, the executive director of CAIR Oklahoma’s chapter unless Hashmi denounced CAIR.  In a bleating response to Calvey's challenge, Hashmi insisted that CAIR is all about "building bridges" and "defending civil rights" of Muslims. “Having me denounce CAIR, that’s out of the question,” ... “I’d never do that.” 

If it weren’t such a tragedy it’d be comedic that CAIR claims to be “building bridges” when their brothers in Hamas are working so hard on coming up with new ways to kill Jews, Americans, and anyone else who disagrees with their perverted religious ideology. 

Razi Hashmi and his fellow Islamofascists at CAIR should never have legitimacy conferred on them or any group they associate with.  Doing so gives aid and comfort to the very people that are working so hard to destroy our country from within.

CAIR and their fellow travelers must be shunned and exposed. The evidence against them is overwhelming and clear. Our political leadership, regardless of party, should be standing in the vanguard setting the example for the rest of us.

Or they should get out of the way of those who will.

Andrew Whitehead
Director
Anti-CAIR
[email protected]
www.anti-cair-net.org

Story Links
http://www.edmondsun.com/local/x282175338/Critics-Officials-should-bypass-CAIR
http://www.anti-cair-net.org/CAIROKemail
http://www.anti-cair-net.org/FBItiesCAIRHamas
http://ftpcontent.worldnow.com/griffin/NEWS9/PDF/1001/Calvey%20CAIR%20Release.pdf
http://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/judges/hlf2.html
http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2008/10/fbi-cair-is-a-front-group-and.html
http://kosu.org/2010/01/candidate-to-protest-cair-meeting/
http://www.anti-cair-net.org/CAIRMuslimsTruth.html
http://www.anti-cair-net.org/EllisonsBehavior
http://www.anti-cair-net.org/CAIRDefendingMuslimBrotherhoodHamasHolyLandFoundation.html

CAIR and North American Muslims; The Truth

Another Anti-CAIR blogburst.

 The recent Islamist terror attack against American warriors preparing for combat deployment from Fort Hood, Texas, serves as a harsh reminder that the threat of terror from home-grown radical Muslims remains a very real danger to our country.  Major Hasan, the alleged terrorist murderer, appears to have been long under suspicion for his anti-American, pro-radical Islamist statements.
  
Following the shooting, many leading mainstream American press outlets blamed Major Hasan's attack on "loneliness"; of being angry over his treatment as the result of his Muslim faith, or his reluctance to support the war on terror by deployment to a war zone.
 
What was, as usual, overlooked by the sycophantic press was the stark reality that slapped all Americans in the face at Fort Hood:  Major Hasan committed his terrorist act and did so with the full blessing of his version of “Allah”; the very same “Allah” that motivates Islamist terrorists like those in Hamas and al Qaeda in their demented desire to impose “paradise on Earth” by terror murdering all who disagree with their “religion of peace”.  Even Hasan's radical Islamist Imam, who formerly preached at a Falls Church, Virginia mosque called Hasan a "hero" for his attack.  What version of Islam does Imam Anwar al-Aulaq represent? Read it all.

CAIR And The Muslim Mafia

An Anti-CAIR blogburst.

A group of investigative reporters have opened the proverbial can of worms for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). The investigative team, organized by Dave Gaubatz and including his son, Chris, and a small band of researchers infiltrated CAIR’s national headquarters for six months and spirited away over 12,000 documents and 300 hours of video that has been compiled into a book that clearly demonstrates CAIR’s plan to cripple and destroy the constitution of the United States from within.

While CAIR, predictably, has publically accused the Gaubatz team and three congressional representatives who announced the disturbing contents of the book, Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld that’s Conspiring to Islamize America, of “Islamophobia”, “racism”, and “bigotry” against Muslims; the fact remains that a growing, bi-partisan group of representatives has taken the first serious steps towards confronting CAIR.  While CAIR strongly condemns the audacity of members of Congress calling for an investigation of CAIR based on Muslim Mafia's revelations, the simple fact remains that during all of CAIR’s false cries of victimhood, CAIR has not refuted one single charge or accusation made in the book.
 
Not one.
 
The reason is simple:  CAIR realizes that it cannot defend against the truth.  The Gaubatz team caught CAIR red handed and no amount of CAIR’s whining can hide or disguise the fact that CAIR is a terrorist supporting front group created to advance the interests of the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas.  Nothing CAIR’s liar-for-hire, “spokesman” Ibrahim Hooper can say will mitigate that fact that CAIR is here to convert our country into an Islamic theocracy; a theocracy that is not only not free, but oppresses every basic human right in the quest for world domination. A domination based on fear, terror, and the subjugation of those not among the “chosen few” who would eventually rule their version of an “Islamic paradise”.

CAIR’s ability to successfully manipulate the news media is testament to CAIR’s ability to utilize “useful idiots” in the media to further its agenda. Damning facts are consistently either avoided or disregarded by CAIR, and irresponsibly ignored by members of the media who lap up CAIR’s whimpers and ignore CAIR’s critics in the false belief that they are giving “voice to the voiceless”; not understanding that their deliberate silence as to the facts about CAIR are no different than giving aid and comfort to our enemies.
 
Long before "Muslim Mafia" (co-authored by Dave Gaubatz and Paul Sperry) was published, however, several members of Congress had warned of CAIR's disturbing origins. One of the first consistent and fearless critics of CAIR has been Democrat Senator Charles Schumer who said: "We know [CAIR] has ties to terrorism…intimate links with Hamas."  Senator Schumer made these statements during a September 2003 Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology and Homeland Security where the evidence against CAIR was laid out in detail. CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad was invited to testify at this gathering, but chose to avoid the meeting and instead submitted a crude and absurd written statement listing CAIR's "accomplishments" and childishly attacking critics.

  Senator Schumer continues to give unapologetic support in efforts to investigate and exclude CAIR from involvement in government programs, including "training" the FBI. In February of 2009, Senator Schumer joined Senators Kyl and Coburn in contacting the FBI to state their support for the FBI severing ties to CAIR saying "We certainly support that action..."

Democrat Senator Barbara Boxer has also called out CAIR. She recalled an award to CAIR's Basim Elkarra when she researched and learned of his involvement with CAIR and CAIR's ties to Hamas. In addition to recalling the award, Senator Boxer also told CAIR to remove her statement endorsing CAIR from their web site. CAIR blasted Senator Boxer saying her actions were rooted in "Islamophobia."  Senator Boxer made clear her feelings about CAIR when she said:  "To praise [CAIR] because they haven't been indicted is like somebody saying, 'I'm not a crook'"

When Representative Sue Myrick was joined by congressional colleagues and members of the Anti-Terrorism Caucus at a news conference to announce their request for the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate efforts by the CAIR to lobby congress illegally and place CAIR interns in sensitive agencies, CAIR thought they had an easy mark with eager media assistance to vilify these Republican representatives as "attacking Muslims" and deflect the attention away from the evidence of CAIR's dubious ties to terrorism. However, Sue Myrick founded the bipartisan Anti-Terrorism Caucus which consists of over 120 congressional members and includes Representatives Bud Cramer (D-AL), Kay Granger (R-TX), and Jane Harman (D-CA) who are the Caucus co-chairs.  A Caucus statement demonstrates that CAIR is a serious problem for all Americans, not just an issue for one political party:
 

“Terrorists don’t target Democrats or Republicans. They target Americans, and this is why
we must face this issue as Americans. Members of Congress and the American public must
know the threats we face from radical jihadist terrorists. The Anti-Terrorism Caucus
will give Congress the tools and resources it needs to communicate those threats
to the public, as well as help them make more informed decisions when it comes
to terrorist issues.”

CAIR's "attacking Muslims" meme is their classic ploy to misdirect the issue away from CAIR's creation for supporting Hamas. Their documented defensive tactic of attacking the messenger because "the credibility of the message depends on the credibility of the messenger" is now in full operational mode. As soon as Myrick and her colleagues made their announcement, CAIR damage-control went into high gear issuing bleating media reports and having CAIR apologists appear on cue to falsely accuse the authors of "Muslim Mafia" and congressional members of being "anti-Islam" and "Islamophobes."

CAIR has pressed the narrative that author Gaubatz is "anti-Islam" and "anti-Muslim" even though the evidence shows the exact opposite is true.  Gaubatz has risked his life helping Muslims, which includes leading a dangerous mission in 2003 to extract members of an Iraqi Muslim family out of Iraq who now affectionately call Gaubatz the "American Angel".  Gaubatz has also come to the aid of Muslims under assault by CAIR.

The authors of "Muslim Mafia" make their intentions quite clear: 

“This is not a book about Islam or about Muslims in general. It is about the threat known
from Shariah Islam and violent jihad propagated by a criminal class of Muslims
known as the Muslim Brotherhood or the ‘Ikhwan mafia’...”

  Representative Myrick could not be more specific on who she is targeting:

“Why would anyone allow a group, who the FBI says is tied to terrorism, to influence
national security policy, or any policy for that matter?”...“If the FBI has cut ties
with CAIR, Congress should wake up and do the same.”

 
The gauntlet has been thrown and CAIR has, so far, refused to point out any parts of "Muslim Mafia" that are not true. This is further evidence, as if any was needed, that CAIR has once again been exposed as a dangerous organization that supports many who would be happy to kill us if they were given half a chance.
 
Members of the Congressional Anti-Terrorism Caucus have called for hearings. Now is the time for the Caucus to sit as a group and hold some hearings of their own, and once and for all give CAIR’s leadership the spotlight they crave; let CAIR explain away all the evidence compiled against them and just how they really defend “Muslim civil rights” in America.

Anti-CAIR Book Review: Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld Thats Conspiring to Islamize America

I received this subscriber email from Anti-CAIR.

I want to share what I believe is one of the most important books to come out regarding the dangerous activities of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), an FBI identified front group created for Hamas.

     "Muslim Mafia" exposes CAIR’s activities to the light of day and clearly demonstrates with convincing proof that CAIR is in America with the primary purpose of weakening our country in favor of CAIR's proclaimed version of radical Islam; a political and violent ideology that has evolved into the most wicked and destructive “religion” in existence.

     No person reading "Muslim Mafia" will ever be able to say “I didn’t know” the truth about CAIR and CAIR’s proven relationships with Islamist terrorists, Islamist terrorist groups, and enemies within our own government who are working diligently, day and night, to destroy Western Democracy.

     In the book –

    •  Evidence that Randall “Ismail” Royer is receiving direct assistance from CAIR to overturn his conviction on terrorism-related charges; despite Royer’s confession.  (Chapter 2)

    •  CAIR’s image as the “Muslim NAACP” is based almost entirely on bluff; CAIR suffers from an extremely high staff turnover and has been losing money for years.  (Chapter 9)

    •  How CAIR attempts to blackmail corporate America; included is CAIR’s involvement in the “Flying Imams” case  (Chapter 12, “CAIR versus United Airways”)

     When you are done reading "Muslim Mafia", your responsibilities are not over; you will want to share this book with everyone you know; to write your members of the Congress and demand CAIR be shut down; to demand that your local and state law enforcement have nothing to do with CAIR; to demand the Department of Justice investigate and make a final determination of just what CAIR is…and isn’t.

     While you read "Muslim Mafia", keep in mind the very strong charges made against CAIR.  Ask yourself, “If CAIR believes these charges are not true, what will CAIR do?”

     As CAIR’s well-known lawsuit against Anti-CAIR clearly demonstrated, the truth is an absolute defense, and in the end, CAIR cannot stand the truth.

     I personally predict that CAIR will accuse the authors of “Islamophobia”; of attacking Islam to “make a profit” or some other trumped-up accusation(s) that will attempt to place the onus on the authors.

     "Muslim Mafia" is a clarion call that describes how our country is in grave danger.

     We must thank Dave and Chris Gaubatz, Paul Sperry, and all those involved for their bravery and dedication to bring us this daring exposure of CAIR's true face.

     Again, we have been warned; what are we going to do about CAIR?

CAIR Caught Selling Radical Islamist Material in Public Park

A must see video from STACLU.

ACT! For America, Jacksonville and Orlando Chapters, caught the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) Orlando Chapteron tape,selling radical Islamist propaganda at their Community Service/Family Picnic two weeks ago at the Central Florida Fairgrounds. Notice how they deny, deny, deny and try to throw the American camera crew off this public space.

The FBI has publicly stated that CAIR along with 80% of Saudi-funded mosques in the USA and Europe support Sayyid Qutb’s “CONVERT TO ISLAM OR BE ELMINATED” Doctrine. Hamas, al-Qaeda, the Taliban, Iran and Syria are the enforcement branch of this doctrine, which CAIR promotes and sells at ‘family gatherings’ on American public property.

Act For America www.actforamerica.org

CAIR: Defending Muslim Student “rights”?

Another Anti-CAIR blogburst.

When Americans send their children to school, it is assumed that the school will reasonably protect the student from harm; this includes college. What if this harm is inflicted by an agency of the federal government; an agency that has as part of its mission the protection of individual rights? What if that agency were the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)?

LeHighvalleylive.com reports that the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is claiming that local colleges are not protecting the rights of predominantly Somali Muslim college students. CAIR claims that it has received “numerous reports” by Muslim students that they are being “interrogated” by FBI agents. The students are being questioned as part of an on-going investigation into the whereabouts of several male Somali students whom have gone missing and are suspected of leaving the US to fight in Somalia’s long-running civil war.

http://www.lehighvalleylive.com/newsflash/index.ssf?/base/national-1/12393293616770.xml&storylist=national&thispage=1

In an article titled, “Pressure by FBI puts Somalis in bind” CAIR’s Minnesota chapter civil rights director Taneeza Islam claims “Students' legal rights need to be upheld and they aren't currently being afforded the only true legal protection they have when talking to the law enforcement-an attorney."

Islam’s concern is confirmed by this example of the FBI’s brutal interrogation methods involving a Muslim student: “In December, one of her friends who works for the University of Minnesota police approached her, saying the FBI would like to talk about her organization. The agent, she said, was polite and made it clear she could refuse to talk. "He wanted to know how we got funded and what activities we do," she said of the 20-minute interview. He also wanted to know "how some of the missing boys were involved in the organization," she said, adding she never felt pressured.”

So, the FBI agent explained she didn’t have to talk and the student stated the agent was polite. Where is the coercion? What “rights” did the FBI agent not explain?

Considering CAIR’s reputation when it comes to providing legal advice; buyer beware. In addition to the numerous proven allegations that CAIR is directly tied to Islamic terrorism and individual Islamic terrorists, CAIR has also been accused of providing shoddy legal advice to the very North American Muslim population it claims to represent and protect.

http://www.saneworks.us/uploads/news/applications/27.pdf

What does it say about CAIR when they apparently set off to deliberately commit fraud against American Muslims?

So why would the Somali Muslim students turn to CAIR for legal advice? The simple answer, from the article, is that they didn’t. Nowhere in the article does CAIR make the claim that CAIR supplied any legal advice to any of the students. Why? Would it be outside the realm of possibility that CAIR completely fabricated that claim that “numerous” students filed complaints with them?

We also learn from the article that apparently none of the students interviewed for the article had anything bad to say about the FBI, except CAIR. None of the students stated that they were abused, denied rights, or forced to answer any questions. None were taken into custody.

For instance, the opening line from the article: “When the FBI approached the young women at the University of Minnesota, they said they didn't mind talking.” Does this sound like abuse, or a case where Muslim Somali students are responding to legitimate FBI concerns?

And:

From the article, “But the women, both second-year students who don't want their names used because they fear for their safety, said the investigation into whether missing Somali men from Minnesota have been recruited by terrorists to fight in their homeland has left many students caught between wanting to help investigators find the truth and facing scorn from some in their community.”

Where is the abuse? Actually, from the statements of the Muslim women, it sounds as if they have more to fear from their own Muslim community than they do from the FBI. Why doesn’t CAIR step up and demand that local law enforcement provide protection to those who want to cooperate in the investigation? Once again, CAIR selectively focus’s “outrage” against not only the college, FBI, but against Muslim students who see nothing wrong with providing information that may help locate fellow missing students.

Just what is CAIR’s game? CAIR recently announced that it is severing ties with the FBI because the FBI, rightly, cut off contact with the terrorist supporting “civil rights” group.

http://www.investigativeproject.org/985/fbi-cuts-off-cair-over-hamas-questions

The truth of CAIR’s disdain for the FBI is summed up by Islam’s statement regarding the FBI cut off of contact with CAIR; from the article: “Islam added the FBI’s decision to discontinue its outreach efforts through CAIR “is a huge loss for them”.” However, can anyone remember when CAIR has ever provided genuine, actionable information to the FBI or any other law enforcement agency that resulted in the prevention of a radical Islamic action?

It took the FBI over ten years to end its association with CAIR; an association that contributed absolutely nothing to the FBI’s understanding of peaceful Islam and CAIR calls it a “huge loss for them”. This would be laughable if it weren’t so pathetic.

We can take heart that it appears that none of the students approached CAIR for assistance or took any of CAIR’s “legal” advice. Apparently, the Somali Muslim students simply aren’t aware that the FBI is as bad as CAIR claims them to be. What is left unanswered by CAIR is, “if the FBI is so bad regarding Muslim civil rights, why does CAIR complain about ties being severed?”

This article was an excellent example of CAIR’s waning influence and inability to attract attention to yet another non-event involving American Muslims having their rights “violated”.

It didn’t happen, CAIR knows it, and the students did not support even one of CAIR’s claims.

Perhaps the Somali Muslim students understand the threat of radical Islam and want to do what they can to assist their adopted country in the battle against radical Islam. Maybe they understand, as others do not, exactly how bad radical Islam in practice really is and want no part of it in the USA?

Either way, it is a great win for the FBI and a smack in the face to CAIR’s attempts to butt in where they aren’t wanted or needed.

CAIR’s Chairman Larry Shaw; Useful Idiot or Co-conspirator?

Another Anti-CAIR blogburst.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has recently elected State Senator Larry Shaw as the organizations new chairman. Is Senator Shaw a “useful idiot” or a co-conspirator in CAIR plans for converting North America into an Islamist dictatorship?

In an article in the News & Observer (North Carolina), Shaw appears to be a low-key chairman; as Shaw puts it, “I fly beneath the radar…that suits my style”.

CAIR often describes itself as the nation’s “leading Muslim civil rights advocacy group” despite the fact that CAIR represents fewer than one-tenth of one percent of North American Muslims and is arguably the leading pro-Islamist terrorist supporting front group in North America. The exposure of CAIR's connections to the Hamas terrorist group are portrayed by CAIR as being "Islamophobia" led by a small group of critics. 

As to the truth of CAIR’s complicity in the Holy Land trial, Shaw has stated that CAIR rejects the accusation and “his first order of business will be to clear the group’s name”. Shaw never acknowledges court wiretap evidence presented by the FBI in which CAIR founders Awad and Ahmad pledge and plot in support of Hamas, and Shaw goes on to dismiss justified reservations about CAIR saying, “It’s straight out of the playbook they use for all the civil rights groups…this is nothing new…if they had anything, they would have acted on it and shut us down.”

The United States government has tied CAIR to Hamas and has refused to back down to CAIR’s demands that it be removed from a list of co-conspirators.  Still fuming, CAIR, under the guise of a new "coalition" of dubious Islamist Muslim groups called the "American Muslim Taskforce on Civil Rights and Elections" (AMT), has now sought to intimidate the FBI with a threat of suspending "outreach" programs of several Muslim groups if the FBI does not re-open it's doors to CAIR.

Shaw, much like Nihad Awad and Ibrahim Hooper, compares CAIR to civil rights groups led by men such as Martin Luther King (MLK). This is both disingenuous and a false comparison. MLK fought for equality of opportunity based on the content of a man’s character; CAIR fights for Islamic supremacy based on the religious fanaticism of the ideology of political Islam; an Islamist cult that, to this day, advocates for the imposition of Sharia law world-wide.

Shaw is portrayed as having a “fine personality” and is a person who does not back Muslims “reflexively” and who is “willing to criticize dictatorial countries as well as Hamas’ practice of firing rockets into Israel”.

A clue to Shaw’s election to CAIR Chairman is revealed:

“…some have suggested that Shaw was chosen to lead CAIR precisely because
he can soften its sometimes combative image.”>

Khalilah Sabra, director of the local chapter of Muslim American Society’s Freedom Foundation, says of Shaw: “Shaw’s role with CAIR is to give them a balanced perspective…he can mentor them on how to transcend certain cultural predispositions”.

A balanced perspective?

Consider, CAIR shamelessly supports Hamas, Islamist terrorism and terrorists. How do you “balance perspective” with a clear record of defending pure, unadulterated, religious evil committed in the name of a false, hateful “god”?

Shaw says of being a Muslim in the United States, “Not everybody’s cut out for this…(adding that being a Muslim can be)…radioactive”.

Really?  Can Shaw point to any credible anti-Islamic conspiracy in North America? 

Neither can CAIR. Simply because none exist.

What Shaw can point out is that there are many groups,Anti-CAIR among them, who stand opposed to what Larry Shaw has chosen to represent; political Islam in the form of a terrorist supporting front group created for Hamas. By dismissing irrefutable FBI evidence and parroting CAIR's denials of it's terrorist origins, we tend to believe that Larry Shaw is a “useful idiot” in that he clearly does not understand what he has gotten himself into.If he does understand, he has gone far beyond being a simple co-conspirator.

Beware.  The new “softer side” of CAIR is among us ...

Flying Imams Lose in Court

Remember these guys?

The six Imams who boarded US Airlines Flight 300 and proceeded to behave in an intimidating and suspicious manner. Refusing to sit in their assigned seats, pairing off to sit near the front, middle and rear exits. Requesting unneeded seat belt extenders. Three of the Imams had no baggage and one way tickets, and one passenger who speaks Arabic says the Imams talked about Osama bin Laden and condemned America for killing Saddam Hussein.

The behavior clearly intended to cause an uproar among the passengers and it worked. The Federal Air Marshals delayed the flight and asked the Imams to leave. When the Imams refused they were arrested.

Of course the Imams went on to sue US Airlines and the passengers while CAIR threatened boycotts, and trying to promote a "flying while Muslim" campaign.

But it was all in vain.

The U.S. Department of Transportation said an airline didn’t discriminate against six imams when it removed them from a flight at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport in 2006.

The department’s assistant general counsel, Samuel Podberesky, informed the Council on American-Islamic Relations of the department’s conclusion in a Jan. 14 letter.

But the department did fault US Airways for refusing to book the men on another flight after the FBI cleared them.

The letter is among several exhibits entered last week in a lawsuit the imams filed against the airline and the airport in federal court in Minneapolis. The trial is scheduled for August.

The men claim they were discriminated against because they appeared Middle Eastern and some of them prayed before boarding the flight.

Result: Victory for safe air travel, common sense, and courageous "John Does" who refuse to be intimidated.