An Anti-CAIR blogburst.
Joseph Farah is irate. And rightly so.
The highly respected founder, editor and CEO
of WorldNetDaily was blatantly slandered
last week by CAIR's communication director, and terrorist supporter,
Ibrahim Hooper.
The Daily News had a column that referred to a
new book from WND Books called "Why We Left Islam: Former
Muslims Speak Out."
Looking for a quote from a Muslim about the
book, the
columnists at the Daily News
went to CAIR, specifically, Ibrahim Hooper:.
"This
book is put out by WND Publishing (sic), which promotes hate every day
on its extremist anti-Muslim hate site. The editor is a guy who
suggested
air-dropping pig's blood over Afghanistan."
What Hooper has done here is exactly how
Farah, in an Editorial,
describes it:
"Hooper
put a target on my back ... He also uttered a false and defamatory
statement about me that has yet to be corrected by the Daily News, has
yet
to be withdrawn by Hooper and will undoubtedly be recycled in other
venues"
Over one week later, and only after Farah's
editorial, CAIR sent this pathetic "explanation" to
Farah from it's legal counsel Nadhira F. Al-Khalili:
"In
the interest of accuracy," ... "Mr. Hooper was referring to a
WorldNetDaily column,
presumably approved by you as editor of the
website, which advocated telling
Afghans that the U.S. has 'enlisted
Afghani (sic) moles to contaminate
their water supplies with pig's
blood."
Mr. Farah is justifiably not
satisfied. He told Al-Khalili:
"Your client has an
obligation to apologize for those comments
and seek correction at the point of publication"
In one area there was some progress. The attorney for the Daily News
has told Mr. Farah that they will publish a correction in the near future. The
"explanation" given by CAIR's Al-Khalili, however, is nothing but
a middle-fingered salute straight back at Mr. Farah. It is absurd.
Consider that Ibrahim Hooper is a top officer
of America's number one Muslim Brotherhood created
terror-front group: CAIR.
Why would Hooper spew such an outrageous
distortion of truth? Because
he undoubtedly feels that nobody will call him on it, or even
investigate the fact that he fabricated a lie against Farah simply
because WND is considered by many in the mainstream media as "right
wing" and "pro-Israel" and that CAIR "advocates" for "oppressed"
Muslims in America. Although Hooper got his legal servant to offer an
excuse, this event should be far from over.
Mr. Hooper knows exactly what he's doing. He
may think he's untouchable.
Picture Mr. Hooper clapping his claws like a
little school-girl when his slanderous quote got published.
Of course Hooper knows WND is a news source
that actually practices
"journalism" and has the integrity to carefully source all the facts
they present in a story, unlike the Daily News, who couldn't be
bothered to check on Hooper's claim concerning Farah. Could it be that
Hooper was throwing mud at Farah in the hopes that it would stick, to
offset actual damning expressions from CAIR Officials?
Here's
some true quotes from Hooper and other CAIR Officers. These quotes are
actually sourced, factual, and at all times, objectionable.
Ibrahim Hooper:
"I
wouldn't want to create the impression that I wouldn't like the government of the United States to be
Islamic sometime in the future...But I'm not going to do anything
violent to promote that. I'm going to do it through
education."
Omar Ahmad:
"Those who stay in America should be open to society without melting,
keeping Mosques open so anyone can come and learn about Islam. If you
choose to live here, you have a responsibility to deliver the message
of Islam ... Islam isn't in America to be equal
to any other faiths, but to become dominant. The Koran, the Muslim book
of scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the
only accepted religion on Earth."
"Fighting for freedom, fighting
for Islam, that is not suicide," ..."They kill themselves for
Islam."
" Politics is a
completion
of War "
Nihad Awad:
"I
am in support of the Hamas
movement."
"Address
people according to their minds. When I speak
with the American, I speak
with someone who doesn't know anything."
Ahmed Bedier:
"Catholic priests pose more of a terrorism threat
by having sex with young altar boys than those who flew planes
into the World Trade Center."
Ahmad Al-Akhras:
"Americans in general might be more supportive
of targeted attacks on civilians
as part of the war on terror, than U.S. Muslims"
Mr. Farah asks in "Farah v. CAIR":
"What should I do?"
Anti-CAIR
feels that Joseph Farah and WND have always been extremely fair and
accurate when they have published stories and investigative reports
about CAIR. WND has always taken great pains to be truthful and source
their material. We also feel that WND, in it's quest to actually
practice journalism and fairness, comes off as soft and non threatening
to the likes of Hooper. Since when have "just the
facts" worried an
Islamist like Hooper and CAIR?
CAIR may think they have nothing to fear from
WND. After all, anything
WND prints about CAIR is creatively refuted by CAIR and gobbled up by
the mainstream media as "CAIR Myths" and just another attack by an
"extremist anti-Muslim hate site."
WND is a variety-type news source.
They are complete in their coverage of daily national/world events and
only deal with an issue about CAIR when it's newsworthy - like when
another CAIR official is indicted, or when CAIR is exposed eagerly
supporting a terrorist.
And why should CAIR ever fear the mainstream
media? When the New York Times or Washington Post
write about CAIR, their "reporters" refuse to present the actual facts
about CAIR because they don't want to "get down in the weeds"
about CAIR, or
because Muslims are "oppressed" in this country. Why should CAIR worry
about WND or Joseph Farah?
What should you do, Mr. Farah?
Anti-CAIR suggests:
"Cry
Havoc, And Let Slip The Dogs Of War"
Recent Comments